Unificar
Kyokushin Karate |
KYOKUSHIN NEWS |
Unificar
Kyokushin Karate |
CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE LEGAL BATTLE OF SOSAI MASUTATSU OYAMA WILL
In this page you will find the latest news about Kyokushin around the world. if you would like to contribute to this page, please do so, just send me and e-mail (angel@kyokushincanada.com) with the information you may have. thank you. osu!
In the last few years we have witnessed many events happening in the Kyokushin organization around the world. Many important members of the different Kyokushin factions have left their organizations to join other groups or to create a new Kyokushin organization. Below is a resume of some of those events.
YEAR 2001
In June, 2001 Shihan Yasuhiro Shichinohe and Shigeru Tabaka resigned
from the IKO 2 (June, 2001), and join forces with other Kyokushin Branch Chiefs
to create a new Kyokushin organization called the "Kyokushin Union".
YEAR 2002
In November 19, 2002 Shihan Hatsuo Royama, was expelled from the
IKO 1. He join forces with Dr. Yoshiharu Umeda to create the Kyokushin-kan and
also to reestablished once again the "Kyokushin Shogakukai Foundation".
In November 25, 2002 Sensei Hajime Kazumi (World Kyokushin
champion and All Japan champion), resigned from the IKO 1. He join Shihan
Tsuyoshi Hiroshige. After that he also left Shihan Hiroshige to create his
own organization with 6 others independent Kyokushin Dojos. the latest rumors
are that Sensei Kazumi join Shihan Royana Organization (Kyokushin-Kan).
In November 26, 2002 Shihan Tsuyoshi Hiroshige
(Sensei Kazumi's teacher), resigned from the IKO 1.
In November 29, 2002 Shihan Koyoma Akio (Shihan's Royama student),
resigned from the IKO 1.
In December, 2002 Shihan Henri-Oh chairman of the North American
Kyokushin Organization (NAKO) resigned from the IKO 2, so the North American
Kyokushin Organization became an independent Kyokushin Organization. Some of
their members got associated with other groups.
YEAR 2003
In April 19, 2003 Dr.
Yoshiharu Umeda after many months of demanding negotiations with the Japanese
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, finally
succeeded in reregistering Sosai's Kyokushin Shogakukai Foundation.
The
Kyokushin Shogakukai Foundation (Zaidan Hojin Kyokushin Shogakukai) was first
registered in the 1960's in Sosai Oyama name to insure that the integrity of his
Karate was preserved for all time. Sosai's Oyama wanted all revenue generated
through fees and donations to the organization be collected by the Kyokushin
Shogakukai Foundation, so that the money was use in the benefits of the students. This
Foundation was suspended temporarily on July 15, 1990, less than four years
prior to Sosai's death. According to Shihan Cameron Quinn, It is possible that
the tremendous volume of paperwork required by the government to maintain
accountability may have ultimately become too much for Sosai.
In, 2003 Shihan Cameron Quinn, Resigned the IKO 1and join Shihan Hatsuo Royama organization as a General Secretary of the Kyokushin-Kan, Shihan Royama's group, which is recognized by the Kyokushin Shogakukai Foundation.
RESULTS OF LAWSUIT ABOUT kYOKUSHIN'S NAMES AND MARKS
Below are the results of two independent lawsuits made at the Tokyo district court and the Osaka district court by 10 Shihans affiliated with the all Japan Kyokushin Union.
IN SEPTEMBER 29, 2003 The
Tokyo district court ruled in favor of the Claim
made by five regional Branch Chiefs of Kyokushin Karate who had filed a lawsuit
in the Tokyo District Court claiming that their being prevented from using the
names and marks of Kyokushin Karate by regional representatives of the Tokyo Honbu was illegal.
The lawsuit was filed with the Tokyo
District Court, by:
Shihan Daigo Oishi,
Shihan Yasuo Takahashi,
Shihan Shigeru Tabata,
Shihan Yasuhiro Shichinohe and
Shihan Yasuhiro Kuwajima,
All of them member of the All Japan Kyokushin Union.
Also with the Osaka District
Court, plaintiffs Mr Yukio Okada, Mr Kazuyuki Hasegawa, Mr Riichi Setto, Mr Jun
Miwa and Mr Shigenori Sakamoto, another 5 Shihans from their side. So, they had 2
independent lawsuits going on at the same time, of which by coincidence the
judgment came one after the other (See below the result of this lawsuit).
The court found that Sosai Oyama passed away in April, 1994. Matsui, claiming he
had been named the successor in Sosai’s Will, registered the names
“Kyokushinkaikan”, “Kyokushin Karate” and so on. As well, Shihan Matsui directed
that others could not advertise in the telephone directories. As a result, the
Branch Chiefs claimed that their member enrolments were affected and so
requested compensation.
It was acknowledged that the validity of the Will naming Shihan Matsui as successor had
been previously been denied in a separate lawsuit (Sosai
Masutatsu Oyama's family filed a protest against the Will, as they suspected it
to be a forgery. First the Tokyo Family Affairs Court,
next the Tokyo High Court and last the Supreme Court ruled that "It
cannot be recognized that this Will originates from the real intention of Sosai
Oyama). As a result, the court found,
it was only natural that it be deemed that Sosai Oyama did not name a successor
while he was still alive. The court also found that Shihan Matsui’s demands that
the Branch Chiefs could not use the name and logos was an abuse of any rights
held by him.
In handing down
his decision, Judge Toshiaki Limura said that (Shokei Matsui) and the regional
dojo operators working directly under the (IKO1) Honbu did not hold the rights
and privileges of the first Chairman of Kyokushin Karate, Masutatsu Oyama, and
so had no right to prevent others from using the names and marks of Kyokushin
Karate.
The court found that while the defendant (Shihan Matsui) had assumed the role of
the second chairman upon the death of Sosai Masutatsu Oyama, many regional
Branch Chiefs did not accept him as the successor and in fact the Kyokushin
Karate organization had split up. The defendant had registered various names and
marks of Kyokushin Karate and had demanded that the plaintiffs (Branch
Chiefs) cease
from using these marks.
Judge Toshiaki Limura ruled that the successor to Sosai
was never fully determined and ordered that Shihan Matsui pay the sum of
¥2.5million in compensation to the Branch Chiefs.
So basically, this means that Shihan Matsui can no
longer stop anyone who was a Branch Chief under Sosai in Japan from using the
Kyokushin names and logos.
IN SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
The Osaka District Court
ruled in favor of a lawsuit filed by five Karate dojo operators and students of
the late Sosai Masutatsu Oyama seeking ¥50 million in damages and compensation was
decided upon in the Osaka District Court.
The lawsuit was filed with the Osaka District
Court, by:
Shihan Yukio Okada,
Shihan Kazuyuki Hasegawa,
Shihan Riichi Setto,
Shihan Jun Miwa and
Shihan Shigenori Sakamoto,
All of them member of the All Japan Kyokushin Union.
The plaintiffs (the Shihans mentioned above) claimed that registration of the name and
other trademarks of the school by Shihan Shokei Matsui, Chairman of the IKO 1
Kyokushinkaikan (Honbu in Tokyo), the karate school founded by Kyokushin
Karate’s Masutatsu Oyama, as well as actions by Shihan Matsui preventing other
students of Sosai Oyama from using the names and marks, was an
abuse of his rights.
Judge Kazuo Komatsu, in ordering Matsui to pay
compensation of ¥2.1 million, said that there was no real evidence existing to
support Matsui’s claim that he was the successor to the karate organization.
It was said that Shihan Matsui assumed office in 1994,
claiming authority through Sosai Oyama’s Will. However, this was opposed by many
others students of Sosai Oyama and the organization split into three groups.
In 1997, Shihan Matsui acquired trademark rights to 8
different variations of names and marks relating to Kyokushin Karate. Shihan
Matsui had appealed to NTT forbidding publication of telephone directories in
which the plaintiffs had inserted dojo advertisements which included registered
names and trademarks.
In relation to his judgment, Judge Komatsu pointed to
the fact that the validity of Sosai Oyama’s Will had been denied by the High
Court in 1997. He stated, “Any claim by Shihan Matsui that he was the rightful
successor was lost then.”
The court also declared that the defendant (Shihan
Matsui) had no right to prohibit others from using the name and marks of
Kyokushin Karate.
In October, 2003 Shihan Pedro Pino The Representative and founder of the Kyokushin Karate in Chile (IKO 2), and others Branch chiefs in South America left the Shinkyokushin Organization (IKO 2) and Join the Kyokushin Union.
Year 2003 Sensei Kenji
Yamaki, left the IKO 1 to teach his own style of knockdown Karate, which he called
"Yamaki-ryu". Sensei Kenji Yamaki, became very well known in Kyokushin
Karate for his
achievements.
In 1989 and 1994 he won the "All Japan Open Karate Tournament".
In
1993 he won the "All Japan Weight Class Karate Tournament".
In 1995 Sensei Kenji Yamaki, successfully completed de 100-Man Kumite. Also in 1995 he became the iko
1 world champion in the "the world open karate tournament".
Sensei Kenji Yamaki,
moved to the United states (U.S.A.) where he opened his own Dojo in the "Los
Angeles suburb of Culver City".
YEAR 2004
In April, 2004 The all
Japan Kyokushin Union announce that they will be presenting another lawsuit
against Shihan Shokei Matsui. This time is against the use of the name
"Kyokushin Kaikan Kancho" by Shihan Shokei Matsui.
This time The All
Japan Kyokushin Union is inviting all Branch chiefs who were under Sosai Oyama,
and their sub Branch Chiefs (sub branch chiefs are all the persons who had a
dojo under any branch chiefs who received a certificate directly from Sosai
Oyama) around the world. If you were a Branch Chief or Sub Branch Chiefs under
Sosai Oyama, and are interested in joint the lawsuit, you can send your
information to Shihan Yasuhiro Shichinohe. Below are the complete
information for you to read.
Calls for Plaintiffs
The All Japan Kyokushin Union will soon be entering into action against Shokei Matsui as the defendant by way of a lawsuit regarding the following content. Accordingly, this notice is a call for all those who agree with the purpose of this lawsuit to join us as one of the plaintiffs.
Purpose of the Claim
(Lawsuit Sought)
The defendant, Shokei Matsui, shall not be allowed to the use the name “Kyokushin Kaikan Kancho” <Director> to diffuse Karate and any other related business activity.
Application Requirements to Become a Plaintiff
Those people who were made Shibucho or Bun-shibucho whilst Sosai Masutatsu Oyama was reigning and are still actively operating dojos, no matter with which Kyokushin Karate faction, as Shibucho or Bun-shibucho, may apply to be one of the plaintiffs.
Deadline for Applications : End of April 2004
Please include the following information in your application:
Name/Address/Telephone no./Date of Birth/Affiliated Dojo/Current Region/Your Position in the Organization/Other Contact Details of Applicant
Contact Details for All Japan Kyokushin Union
Shihan Yasuhiro Shichinohe, Int’l Dept, Kyokushin Union
E-mail : k-o-b@cosmos.ne.jp
Fax: 81/98/833-1378
BELOW YOU WILL FIND THE ORIGINAL LETTER FROM SHIHAN
YASUHIRO SHICHINOHE IN REPRESENTATION OF THE
ALL JAPAN KYOKUSHIN UNION, MAKING A CALL TO ALL THOSE WHO WANT TO JOIN THE
PLAINTIFF
Calls for Plaintiffs
After Kancho Masutatsu Oyama, founder of the International Karate Organization Kyokushinkaikan, passed away on April 26 1994, unfortunately the Kyokushinkaikan actually split into several factions.
After the leader of one faction, Mr Shokei Matsui, secretly acquired the rights of the trademarks of the Kyokushinkaikan in his name, he declared that he could rightfully call himself the “Kyokushinkaikan Kancho”.
He has also claimed that those people of Kyokushinkaikan not belonging to his own Matsui faction do not belong to the Kyokushinkaikan and has hindered them in the use of the name etc. in their advertising.
As the so-called will of Kancho Masutatsu Oyama, which stated that Mr Matsui would become the 2nd generation “Kyokushinkaikan Kancho”, was rejected by the Supreme Court, means that Mr Matsui’s grounds for using the name “Kyokushinkaikan Kancho” have become completely invalid.
Furthermore, he has no authority to monopolize the rights of use of the trademarks.
In order to restore these unjust circumstances and to return to the original form of Kyokushinkaikan founded by Kancho Masutatsu Oyama, the All Japan Kyokushin Union will start a lawsuit against defendant Mr Matsui in the near future. The main purpose is to see that he cannot use the name of “Kyokushinkaikan Kancho”, as well as to seek compensation for moral damages.
Accordingly, this notice is a call for all those who agree with the purpose of this lawsuit to join us as one of the plaintiffs.
All those people who were made Shibucho (Branch Chief) or Bun-Shibucho (Sub Branch chief) whilst Sosai Masutatsu Oyama was reigning and are still actively operating Dojos, no matter with which Kyokushin Karate faction, as Shibucho or Bun-shibucho, may apply to be one of the plaintiffs.
Please include the following information in your application:
Name/Address/Telephone no./Date of Birth/Affiliated Dojo/Current Region/Your
Position in the Organization/Other Contact Details of Applicant
Contact Details for All Japan Kyokushin Union
Shihan Yasuhiro Shichinohe, Int’l Dept, Kyokushin Union
E-mail : k-o-b@cosmos.ne.jp Fax: 81/98/833-1378
IN SEPTEMBER, 2004 Shihan Pedro Beltran, A Branch Chief and also the Spain representative of the IKO 3 is expelled from the Kyokushin Organization (IKO 3). The reason given is that he also join the All Japan Kyokushin Union and according to the policy or statutes of the the IKO 3 he can not be a member of two organizations. Due to this incident the All Japan Kyokushin Union release a letter directed to all Kyokushin practitioners around the world. Below you will find the content of this latter.
It is indeed a pity for the Kyokushin Karate World, but after Sosai Masutatsu Oyama passed away, the Kyokushinkaikan has split in several groups.
Nowadays, it seems that each and every group is having its activities in its own group.
We have heard lately that a person belonging to a group was expelled from that group, for the reason of also having joined the All Japan Kyokushin Union, this is a completely wrong policy.
The person who joined the All Japan Kyokushin Union is an independent autonomous Kyokushin dojo, which the All Japan Kyokushin Union gathers in a collective body, so recognizing each Kyokushin group.
On the other hand, this Kyokushin group that expelled its member does not recognize the other Kyokushin groups.
Doing away with the borders of the groups is exactly the goal of the Union.
However it looks like when belonging to one group and joining also the All Japan Kyokushin Union (so being affiliated with two groups) , there cannot be any interchange, even giving it the explanation that it declines the development of Kyokushin Karate.
Besides, the All Japan Kyokushin Union is not denying the Dan grades of another Kyokushin Organization, and we are of the opinion that getting the Kyokushin Karate World together in tournaments only would be very satisfactory.
Therefore when joining the All Japan Kyokushin Union, it is optional to enroll in the “Kyokushin Technical Dan Promotion Institute” (Dan Promotion Test), however the main goal is gathering people in the “Kyokushin Tournament Institute”.
Don’t you think that the group by expelling its member for the reason having joined the All Japan Kyokushin Union is following a not so good policy?
Is it good to go on organizing little activities limited for one’s own group?
Is it good to gather dojo in Kyokushin?
Which way will be beneficial for the Kyokushin Karate World?
We wish that some more people would think about that.
Kazuyuki Hasegawa, Yasuhiro Shichinohe
General Director of the Board International Department
All Japan Kyokushin Union All Japan Kyokushin Union